Now Reading: Court to Indict Ducky Bhai in Gambling Promotion Case on Jan 16 – Full Legal Details
-
01
Court to Indict Ducky Bhai in Gambling Promotion Case on Jan 16 – Full Legal Details
The legal troubles of popular Pakistani YouTuber Saad-ur-Rahman, widely known as Ducky Bhai, have entered a crucial phase. A local court has announced that it will formally frame charges against him and other accused on January 16 in a high-profile gambling promotion case. The development has attracted massive public attention due to Ducky Bhai’s strong online influence and the serious nature of the allegations under Pakistan’s cybercrime laws.
The hearing was conducted by Judicial Magistrate Naeem Wattoo, who presided over the case involving Ducky Bhai, his wife Aroob Jatoi, and other individuals accused of promoting online gambling through digital platforms. During the proceedings, the court made important observations regarding illegal vlogging practices and misuse of social media channels.
Background of the Gambling Promotion Case Against Ducky Bhai
The case against Ducky Bhai originates from allegations that he used his YouTube channel and social media reach to promote online betting and gambling applications. According to investigators, the content shared on his platforms indirectly encouraged viewers to engage in gambling activities, which is prohibited under Pakistani law.
Authorities registered the case under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, a law designed to regulate digital activities and prevent misuse of online platforms. The National Coordination Centre for Internet and Cybercrime Affairs (NCCIA) led the investigation and later submitted a detailed challan (police report) in court.
Judicial Magistrate Sets January 16 for Framing Charges
During the latest hearing, Judicial Magistrate Naeem Wattoo officially announced January 16 as the date for framing charges against all accused, including Ducky Bhai. Copies of the challan were also distributed among the defendants, marking a formal step toward trial.
This move means the court has found enough preliminary evidence to proceed with the indictment process. Once charges are framed, the case will move into the next legal stage, where evidence and arguments will be examined in detail.
Court’s Strong Remarks on Illegal Vlogging
One of the most discussed moments of the hearing came when the magistrate directly addressed Ducky Bhai regarding his vlogging activities. The court stated clearly:
“Vlogging on your YouTube channel without permission is illegal.”
The magistrate further emphasized that Ducky Bhai should have submitted a formal application seeking court permission before continuing any vlogging-related activities.
This statement highlights an important legal point: once a digital channel is seized by authorities, no content can be uploaded without explicit court approval.
Ducky Bhai’s Response to the Court
In response, Ducky Bhai told the court that he believed permission had already been granted through an affidavit submitted during a previous hearing. However, the court rejected this claim and clarified the legal process.
The magistrate responded firmly:
“How can you grant yourself permission? Only the court has the authority to allow this.”
The court explained that submitting an affidavit does not replace the need for a proper application and official court approval.
Confusion Over Vlogging Permission Clarified by the Court
During the hearing, the court questioned whether Ducky Bhai intended to continue vlogging. His lawyer responded by saying they were not currently uploading any content and were unsure what specific permission was required.
To clear the confusion, the magistrate explained that Ducky Bhai’s YouTube channel is the subject of the case and has already been seized by the NCCIA. While Ducky Bhai may record videos, uploading content on the seized channel is illegal unless the court grants permission.
This clarification is significant for content creators, as it sets a legal precedent regarding digital platform seizures and online activity restrictions.
NCCIA’s Role and Submission of the Challan
The NCCIA has played a central role in this case. After conducting a detailed inquiry, the agency submitted a challan accusing the defendants of promoting online gambling through digital content.
According to the investigation, the accused collaborated to market betting platforms by using engaging videos and social media influence. Authorities claim this content targeted a wide online audience, including young viewers, which raised serious legal and ethical concerns.
To prevent further alleged violations, the NCCIA froze the YouTube channel in question, ensuring that no new content could be uploaded during the investigation.
Allegations of Promoting Online Gambling Platforms
Investigators allege that Ducky Bhai and his associates promoted gambling apps in a way that encouraged users to participate in betting activities. Even if the promotion was indirect, authorities believe it still falls under illegal advertising and digital facilitation of gambling.
Under PECA 2016, using electronic platforms to promote unlawful activities is a punishable offense. The case highlights how digital influence comes with legal responsibility, especially when content reaches millions of viewers.
Aroob Jatoi Named as Accused in the Case
A notable aspect of this case is the inclusion of Aroob Jatoi, Ducky Bhai’s wife, as one of the accused. NCCIA named her in the challan due to her alleged role in managing channel operations and facilitating gambling-related content.
While investigators are still examining the extent of her direct involvement, authorities cited collaborative responsibility as the reason for including her in the case. This development sends a strong message that family members involved in digital businesses may also face legal consequences.
Legal Accountability for Digital Content Teams
This case marks a significant moment in Pakistan’s digital law enforcement. It shows that not only content creators but also those who assist in content management and promotion can be held accountable under cybercrime laws.
Experts believe this could lead to stricter compliance among influencers, vloggers, and social media teams. Many creators may now think twice before promoting questionable products or services online.
Previous Hearings and Court Proceedings
In earlier hearings, Ducky Bhai appeared before Judicial Magistrate Naeem Wattoo along with his wife and other accused. The court consistently stressed the importance of following legal procedures, especially regarding seized digital assets.
In the most recent hearing, the magistrate again reminded the accused that self-granted permissions have no legal value and that all digital activity must align with court orders.
What Happens Next in the Ducky Bhai Case?
With January 16 set for framing charges, the case is entering a decisive phase. If the court formally indicts the accused, the trial will proceed with witness testimonies, evidence review, and legal arguments.
The outcome of this case could have long-term effects on Pakistan’s digital content industry. It may lead to stricter monitoring of online promotions and greater awareness about cybercrime laws among influencers.
Impact on Social Media Influencers in Pakistan
The Ducky Bhai gambling promotion case serves as a warning for social media personalities across the country. Authorities have made it clear that online fame does not place anyone above the law.
As digital platforms continue to grow, legal scrutiny is also increasing. Influencers are now expected to understand and follow local laws, especially when promoting apps, brands, or services that may fall into legal grey areas.
Conclusion
The announcement that the court will indict Ducky Bhai in the gambling promotion case on Jan 16 marks a critical turning point in this widely discussed legal battle. With strong remarks from the court, clear involvement of NCCIA, and serious charges under PECA 2016, the case highlights the growing accountability of digital creators in Pakistan.
As the next hearing approaches, all eyes will remain on the court’s decision and its potential impact on the country’s digital and influencer landscape.
